Gov Blog

The United States is born out of a struggle against the autocratic powers of monarchy. The US constitution is intended to counter the ascendancy of preeminent power in any one leader, spreading influence across the three branches; this is a system of balance that, if unduly upset, will unravel the very fabric of liberty upon which the United States is established. Alas, since the founding, executive powers have expanded, and boundaries are continually put to the test. It is vital that we not afford any president so much latitude that, even figuratively, they can “‘stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody’” and not lose voters (Lacapria). This fantasy is the image of a dictator, their power built on fear and personality. It is appropriate to ask: why do we allow this to happen? In many areas of life, there is a tendency to conflate authority and status with righteousness, even infallibility. The most obvious examples are cult leaders. The office of the presidency is no

The article by an unknown author, “ Should American Support Trump on his Immigration Policies? ” explores the sticky issue of immigration, a hot topic of US politics, and a crucial component of President Trump’s campaign platform. The author questions the legitimacy of Trump’s proposed immigration policy in the context of US growth, American greatness, and human rights. The ideas presented have merit and should be examined in consideration of immigration policy reform. Immigration policy is necessary, the absence of such law would create many potential challenges to security and the economy of the country. Without a doubt, US immigration law needs reform, especially concerning DACA. While the author cites no specific evidence to back up their argument, the article alludes to the salient issues of immigration policy, namely: the economy, diversity, ethics, and seekers of asylum. While I think the author has made a mistake in associating Trump’s DACA policy with the separation of chi

When making policy, on what should we base our decisions: values, or data? We have strong values and traditions that inform our political ideology and direction: laws are made, budgets drawn, and our country’s future set. These belief systems are a fundamental aspect of our culture and can provide a strong sense of identity. Longstanding examples of these values include free speech, voting rights, and the right to bear arms, all enshrined in the Bill of Rights. But what if conclusive evidence discredits our values or proves the methods they inspire to be ineffective? In response, we have two distinct choices: to adhere to tradition regardless, ignoring fact, or to pivot in line with our goals. To pivot is frequently problematic. Beliefs become an integral part of our identity, and in confronting them, we often feel personally challenged. However, if we disregard data when voting, setting budgets, and creating policy, we will fail to realize our objectives. Let’s use sexuality edu