A comment on "Original Critique Numero Dos" by Moira

If I understand your meaning correctly, it seems that you are advocating for the inclusion of LGBTQ friendly sex education not only in schools but also within the medical profession. I had not previously considered such training for doctors and nurses; however, it is clear that this is a necessity should we expect our medical practitioners to be able to disseminate accurate and appropriate information for their clients.

Perhaps another consideration is an inclusive, evidence-based, broad curriculum sexuality program for all ages. If our children are to be well educated, they will also need proficient support from their parents and community, not to mention the need for adults to have access to age-appropriate sexuality education that benefits them as well as their children.

Unfortunately, these programs will likely be challenging to implement. Although sexuality education is sparse in US schooling, access is generally approved of by parents. Contention lies in agreeing on what material should be included in programs and who will teach them. Our ability to implement effective programs is hindered by voters' tendency to support policy built on values over data, thus promoting ineffective or irrelevant curriculum. If we want effective education, we must find a way to introduce conclusive data as a basis for policymaking.

An inclusive and broad curriculum of sexuality education (including relational skills) is essential for the physical and mental well being of our society. I hope that we will be able to progress as a country to support one another in this way.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Editorial Critique #1

Michael McGough, senior editorial writer for the Los Angeles Times, pens a short and sensationalized argument in defense of Adam Schiff’s recent statement regarding President Trump’s phone call with with Ukraine Leader Volodymyr Zelensky entitled: “ Adam Schiff’s riff on Trump’s Ukraine call was more truth than parody, but still unwise ”. Although the name of the article implies a commentary that includes both favor and criticism of Schiff, once studied, the editorial’s bias is clear. Any worthy point McGough could have made is lost in excess personal attacks and weakened still by an anemic attempt to project impartiality in his concluding critique of Schiff. Both the author and publisher appear respectable and long-serving. Nonetheless, their propriety is undercut by the bitter nature of this article. From the outset, McGough uses hyperbolic and derogatory descriptors of Trump’s character and behavior. Phrases like “new extremes of crazy” and “deranged” set the tone for the intr
Read more

Values Trump Data

When making policy, on what should we base our decisions: values, or data? We have strong values and traditions that inform our political ideology and direction: laws are made, budgets drawn, and our country’s future set. These belief systems are a fundamental aspect of our culture and can provide a strong sense of identity. Longstanding examples of these values include free speech, voting rights, and the right to bear arms, all enshrined in the Bill of Rights. But what if conclusive evidence discredits our values or proves the methods they inspire to be ineffective? In response, we have two distinct choices: to adhere to tradition regardless, ignoring fact, or to pivot in line with our goals. To pivot is frequently problematic. Beliefs become an integral part of our identity, and in confronting them, we often feel personally challenged. However, if we disregard data when voting, setting budgets, and creating policy, we will fail to realize our objectives. Let’s use sexuality edu
Read more

Beyond Profiteering

An  article  published by  reuters.com  reports on a decision by a U.S. appeals court to continue a case alleging that President Trump has profited from officials who have patronized Trump's businesses. I found most interesting the consideration that beyond profiteering, there is an equally serious concern. As part of the charges brought by the plaintiffs, an accusation made is that officials (both foreign and domestic) may choose to patronize Trump establishments to curry favor.  Although this idea is presented in only one line within the article, it stands out to me as perhaps the most important. Most talking points relating to this subject center around the possibility of President Trump profiteering unconstitutionally. However, we should seriously consider the risk of inappropriate and unfair influence gained by those who support his businesses. President Trump is exceptionally focused on whether or not people like him. This self-concern suggests a possible weakness and a
Read more